🗊Презентация D'

A STUDY OF PROVINCIAL LIFE IN ANTHONY TROLLOPE’S AND M. GAPAROV’S LITERARY WORKS     A DIPLOMA PAPER BY Ulanbek Eshbaev

INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………..……3       CHAPTER I Provincial Life in Literature…………………………………………………..………………………………………….…6 Description of Provincial Life in World Literature.………………….….…………..…6 1.1. M. Gaparov and Rural Themes in Kyrgyz Literature after WW II……...12 1.2. Trollope as the Best Writer of Describing English Provincial Life…......19   CHAPTER II Literary Analysis on M. Gaparov’s and A. Trollope’s Works.....30 2.1. Description about Landscape and Nature …………………………………..…..30 2.2. Peculiarities of Characterization………………….……………………………..……38   CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………….54 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………….………………………………………………...…….………..56

INTRODUCTION The topicality The goal and objective The novelty The theoretical value The practical value The method

CHAPTER I Provincial Life in Literature Description of Provincial Life in World Literature M. Gaparov and Rural Themes in Kyrgyz Literature after WW II A. Trollope as the Best Writer of Describing English Provincial Life

CHAPTER II Literary Analysis on M. Gaparov’s and A. Trollope’s Works 2.1. Description about Landscape and Nature 2.2. Peculiarities of Characterization

CONCLUSION Having studied Gaparov’s and Trollope’s work, I came to the following conclusion. Almost all writers write many stories and they regard those stories with deep nature of provincial life. Moreover, not only in literature, but in real life, provincial areas have considerably significant role in literature. Writers try to persuade their readers by making them closer to their work. And to do this, they have their own style: describing rural features, including landscapes and nature that surround people. Frankly saying in short, Murza Gaparov and Anthony Trollope were among the best writers who could express what people, readers, demand their writings, using provincial life and their features.